quality control raises a handful of sensible questions. This page answers them in order, starting with the fundamentals and moving to applications.
Reviewed 2026-04-20. Anything still debated is marked as such rather than presented as settled.
Practical HPLC testing depends on careful sample preparation and instrument maintenance. Samples may require filtration, dilution, pH adjustment, or extraction to avoid column damage and matrix interference. Mobile phases are degassed and filtered, and columns are equilibrated before injection. Common problems include peak tailing, baseline drift, ghost peaks, carryover, and co-elution of analytes. Documentation of instrument logs, calibration records, and electronic audit trails supports data integrity and traceability. Ongoing training and routine maintenance help reduce variability between analysts and laboratories.
Quality control laboratories use HPLC to check identity, purity, concentration, and stability of raw materials and finished products. A validated method specifies the column, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, and run time. Samples are prepared and compared against reference standards of known concentration. The resulting chromatogram provides quantitative data, such as assay values and impurity levels. This approach is common in pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and industrial testing where consistent measurements are required.
Method validation demonstrates that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical validation characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulatory guidance from bodies such as the International Council for Harmonisation and the United States Pharmacopeia outlines expectations, though specific criteria depend on the product and method. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, column efficiency, and injection repeatability. Failure of these checks can invalidate a batch of measurements.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
| Parameter | Typical acceptance criterion | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ≥ 1.5 | Baseline separation of adjacent peaks |
| Tailing factor | ≤ 2.0 | Peak symmetry measure |
| Theoretical plates | > 2000 | Column efficiency indicator |
| Injection repeatability | ≤ 2% RSD | Relative standard deviation for replicate injections |
| Linearity | r² ≥ 0.995 | Calibration curve over the working range |
Key performance measures include retention time, peak area, peak height, resolution, tailing factor, and plate count. Retention time helps identify a peak under fixed conditions, but confirmation often requires a second method or detector. Peak area and height relate to concentration through calibration curves, which may be linear or nonlinear depending on the detector response. Resolution describes separation between adjacent peaks, while tailing factor and plate count describe peak shape and column efficiency. Performance checks verify these values before and during a run to confirm that the instrument is performing within limits.
High-performance liquid chromatography testing separates components of a liquid sample by forcing a mobile phase through a packed column. The stationary phase inside the column interacts with analytes to different degrees, so each compound exits at a characteristic retention time. A pump delivers solvent at controlled flow and pressure, while an injector introduces a precise sample volume. Detectors such as ultraviolet-visible, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometric instruments record the separated bands. The resulting chromatogram provides qualitative and quantitative information about the mixture.
Routine quality control monitors retention time shifts, baseline noise, system pressure, and peak shape. Trends can reveal column aging, mobile phase preparation errors, detector drift, or sample degradation. Corrective actions may include replacing the column, preparing fresh mobile phase, or recalibrating the detector. Stability testing often uses HPLC to measure parent compound loss and degradation product formation. Open questions remain about how accelerated stability results extrapolate to long-term storage under varied conditions.
Quality control for HPLC testing combines scheduled checks, documented procedures, and review of results. Before sample analysis, system suitability testing confirms that the instrument, column, and method meet predefined criteria. Common criteria include resolution between critical peaks, retention time precision, peak tailing, and theoretical plate count. Failure triggers investigation before results are reported. Records link raw data, calculations, instrument logs, and analyst identity to each batch, supporting audits and repeat analysis.
Detection commonly uses ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Ultraviolet detection depends on molecular chromophores that absorb light at specific wavelengths. Mass spectrometry provides mass information and sensitive quantification, often after electrospray ionization. Before sample batches, performance checks examine resolution, elution time repeatability, peak symmetry, and plate count. Matrix effects and co-elution remain recognized uncertainties; formal validation studies and orthogonal detection help address them. Detector choice depends on analyte properties and required sensitivity.
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid mobile phase through a packed column. Components distribute differently between the stationary phase and the moving liquid, so they travel at different speeds and exit at different times. A detector records these eluting bands as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. The technique supports testing in pharmaceuticals, foods, environmental samples, and industrial chemicals. Quantification usually depends on calibration with known standards.
Several separation modes exist, including reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Reversed-phase uses a nonpolar stationary phase with a polar mobile phase and is widely applied to small organic molecules. Gradient elution changes mobile phase composition during the run, while isocratic elution keeps it constant. Column chemistry, particle size, temperature, flow rate, and mobile phase pH all influence retention and resolution. Method development selects conditions that separate analytes from matrix components and from each other.
Quality control samples are inserted at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision throughout a batch. Blank samples detect contamination, while spiked samples assess recovery from the sample matrix. Calibration standards establish the relationship between detector response and concentration, and control samples are prepared independently from them whenever possible. Laboratories also participate in proficiency testing and maintain audit trails, instrument logs, and reagent records. Ongoing review of control charts can reveal trends before they cause out-of-specification results.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Trials to assess the effectiveness of an immunity passport scheme, also known as a COVID passport or COVID certification scheme, were confirmed by the UK government on 3 April 2021 as a way of helping to restart public events in England during the COVID-19 pandemic. The announcement was made following much discussion and speculation about the idea by politicians and in the British media. The government announced that trials of a scheme for England would begin on 16 April, starting with a comedy evening in Liverpool. In December 2021, COVID passports or similar verification methods became mandatory to access certain high-density venues per government regulations to address the spread of the infections Omicron variant of COVID-19.
ALK-positive ALCL is diagnosed by histological and immunological examinations of involved tissues, typically lymph nodes. These tissues have lymphoma-like infiltrates that have variable numbers of ALCL "hallmark" cells, i.e. cells with kidney- or horseshoe-shaped nuclei that strongly express CD30 as detected by immunohistochemistry and an ALK fusion protein as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. These cells are scattered throughout the infiltrates. WHO classifies these infiltrates into 5 patterns: a common pattern consisting of large variably shaped cells with large nuclei that typically contain multiple nucleoli (60–70% of cases); a small-cell pattern consisting of small to medium-sized neoplastic cells with clear cytoplasm and "hallmark" cells that are concentrated around small blood vessels (5–10% of cases); a lymphohistiocytic pattern consisting of small neoplastic cells along with abundant histiocytes (10% of cases); a Hodgkin's-like pattern in which the architecture resembles the nodular sclerosis pattern of Hodgkin lymphoma (3% of cases); and a composite pattern consisting of two or more of the just described patterns (15% of cases). Detection of circulating autoantibody against ALK supports the diagnosis. Individuals with low levels of these autoantibodies are at an increase risk of relapsing after treatment.
Chiedozie Ngozi Egesi is a Nigerian plant scientist and professor. He is director of numerous research projects dedicated to international agriculture, gender equity and food and nutrition security in agriculture. He received the Achiever in Agriculture Award in 2021 by the Nigeria Agriculture Awards in 2021 and the Kwame Nkrumah Leadership Prize in 2022. Egesi grew up in a farming community in Umuahia South, Abia State. He received a Bachelor of Science from the University of Calabar in 1994 and a Master in Science on Environmental Biology at University of Ibadan in 1997. He earned a Ph.D in Agricultural Biology from University of Ibadan in 2001 He took certificate courses on Statistical Genetics at the University of Washington, Seattle, USA in 2007 and Spring class on Qualitative Trait Loci Analyses and Statistical Genetics at the Cornell University Ithaca, New York in April, 2012.
A synchronous or synchronized culture is a microbiological culture or a cell culture that contains cells that are all in the same growth stage. As numerous factors influence the cell cycle (some of them stochastic) normal cultures have cells in all stages of the cell cycle. Obtaining a culture with a unified cell-cycle stage is useful for biological research where a particular stage in the cell cycle is desired (such as the culturing of parasitized cells). Since cells are too small for certain research techniques, a synchronous culture can be treated as a single cell; the number of cells in the culture can be easily estimated, and quantitative experimental results can simply be divided in the number of cells to obtain values that apply to a single cell. Synchronous cultures have been extensively used to address questions regarding cell cycle and growth, and the effects of various factors on these. Synchronous cultures can be obtained in several ways:
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Aluminon, the triammonium salt of aurintricarboxylic acid, is a dye often used to detect the presence of the aluminium ion in an aqueous solution. Aluminon forms a red complex salt in combination with Al3+. In addition to its use in qualitative inorganic analysis, aluminon has applications in pigment production. It forms brilliantly colored lake pigments with many metals. The pigments are red in combination with Be2+ and Ga3+. The pigment is deep purple or reddish-brown in combination with Fe3+. Color of a particular pigment in acidic solutions may change: aluminon and Sc3+ form red pigments if the solution is acidic, but otherwise the solutions are colorless. Aluminon is prepared by reacting sodium nitrite with salicylic acid, adding formaldehyde, then treating with ammonia. Analytical chemistry Colorimetry
Amino acids are the building blocks of protein and together they form the protein requirements in formula needed for growth and development. The amino acids are in the simplest form, making it easy for the body to process and digest. Amino acid-based formula may be considered hypoallergenic since it does not contain peptides that may trigger an immune response. Because infants and children have different nutritional needs, amino acid-based formulas are typically formulated either for infants 0–1 years of age or for children 1–10 years of age. Amino acid-based formulas may be used for those with cow's milk or soy protein allergy. However, most infants who suffer from food allergy respond well to extensively hydrolysed formulas, and only few of those with the most severe form of the illness require the use of amino acid-based formulas. It may also be used for other medical conditions requiring an amino acid-based diet, such as short bowel syndrome, and for transition from parenteral to enteral nutrition. Milk allergy Food allergy
Drug antagonism refers to a medicine stopping the action or effect of another substance, preventing a biological response. The stopping actions are carried out by four major mechanisms, namely chemical, pharmacokinetic, receptor and physiological antagonism. The four mechanisms are widely used in reducing overstimulated physiological actions. Drug antagonists can be used in a variety of medications, including anticholinergics, antihistamines, etc. The antagonistic effect can be quantified by pharmacodynamics. Some can even serve as antidotes for toxicities and overdose.
A remote data entry (RDE) system is a computerized system designed for the collection of data in electronic format. The term is most commonly applied to a class of software used in the life sciences industry for collecting patient data from participants in clinical research studies—research of new drugs and or medical devices. Typically, RDE systems provide: a graphical user interface component for data entry. a validation component to check user data. a reporting tool for analysis of the collected data. The development of RDE systems started in the mid- to late-1980s as software installed locally on portable computers with modems. It has largely been replaced by a newer generation of software called electronic data capture, or EDC, that provides the same type of functionality over the Internet using web pages. Clinical data acquisition Electronic data capture, provides a brief history of the RDE and EDC software landscape, remote jobs.
miR-324-5p is a reverse strand miRNA, meaning it is produced from the 5' end of the associated RNA, and spans from position 7,223,342 to 7,223,364 on chromosome 17. Its sequence is CGCAUCCCCUAGGGCAUUGGUG. miRNA forms following cleavage of pre-miRNA at the hairpin loop by the enzyme dicer within the cytosol. Interestingly, both strands of miR-324's pre-miRNA hairpin loop structure, miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p, become active miRNAs with distinct targets and functions. miR-324-5p has between 166 and 469 predicted targets, including regulators of cell growth, proliferation, survival, cytoskeletal structure, ATP transport, and ion channels. Though miR-324-5p is found on chromosome 17, its targets span across all chromosomes.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Phospholipase D2 (PLD2) binds PIP2 and localizes with lipid rafts. Increases in cholesterol overcome PIP2 binding and sequester PLD2 into GM1 lipid rafts away from its substrate phosphatidylcholine. Efflux of cholesterol causes PLD2 to translocate to PIP2 domains where it is activated by substrate presentation. Both PIP2 signaling and cholesterol signaling regulate the enzyme. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE2) is regulated by PIP2 localization. The ACE2 enzyme is palmitoylated which drives the protein into GM1 lipids. The enzyme also bind to PIP2 which moves it out of the endocytic pathway. The drug hydroxychloroquine blocks ACE2 interaction with PIP2 in multiple cell types shifting its localization. PIP2 binding proteins PH domain PIP2/palmitate proteins GABAA receptor
In Brazil, the Aeronautical Accidents Investigation and Prevention Center (CENIPA) was established under the auspices of the Aeronautical Accident Investigation and Prevention Center, a Military Organization of the Brazilian Air Force (FAB). The organization is responsible for the activities of aircraft accident prevention, and investigation of civil and military aviation occurrences. Formed in 1971, and in accordance with international standards, CENIPA represented a new philosophy: investigations are conducted with the sole purpose of promoting the "prevention of aeronautical accidents". In Canada, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB), is an independent agency responsible for the advancement of transportation safety through the investigation and reporting of accident and incident occurrences in all prevalent Canadian modes of transportation – marine, air, rail and pipeline. In China, the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) is solely responsible for all air investigations and safety inside the country after the split from the formal CAAC Airlines.
The primary medical treatment of acromegaly is to use somatostatin analogues – octreotide (Sandostatin) or lanreotide (Somatuline). Somatostatin analogues are also sometimes used to shrink large tumors before surgery. Because octreotide inhibits gastrointestinal and pancreatic function, long-term use causes digestive problems such as loose stools, nausea, and gas in one-third of people. In addition, approximately 25 percent of people with acromegaly develop gallstones, which are usually asymptomatic. In some cases, octreotide treatment can cause diabetes because somatostatin and its analogues can inhibit the release of insulin. With an aggressive adenoma that is not able to be operated on, there may be a resistance to octreotide in which case a second-generation SSA, pasireotide, may be used for tumor control. However, insulin and glucose levels should be carefully monitored as pasireotide has been associated with hyperglycemia by reducing insulin secretion.
The SC was decommissioned in 1990, after having been in operation for more than three decades. As a consequence, the collaboration decided to relocate the ISOLDE facility to the Proton Synchrotron, and place the targets in an external beam from its 1 GeV booster. The construction of the new ISOLDE experimental hall started about three months prior to the decommissioning of the SC. With the relocation also came several upgrades. The most notable being the installation of two new magnetic dipole mass separators. One general-purpose separator with one bending magnet and the other one is a high-resolution separator with two bending magnets. The latter one is a reconstructed version of the ISOLDE 3. The first experiment at the new facility, known as ISOLDE PSB, was performed on 26 June 1992. In May 1995, two industrial robots were installed in the facility to handle the targets and ion sources units without human intervention.
The cell-mediated response to the virus and to vectors is poorly characterised, and has been largely ignored in the literature as recently as 2005. Clinical trials using an AAV2-based vector to treat haemophilia B seem to indicate that targeted destruction of transduced cells may be occurring. Combined with data that shows that CD8+ T-cells can recognise elements of the AAV capsid in vitro, it appears that there may be a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to AAV vectors. Cytotoxic responses would imply the involvement of CD4+ T helper cells in the response to AAV and in vitro data from human studies suggests that the virus may indeed induce such responses, including both Th1 and Th2 memory responses. A number of candidate T cell stimulating epitopes have been identified within the AAV capsid protein VP1, which may be attractive targets for modification of the capsid if the virus is to be used as a vector for gene therapy. There are several steps in the AAV infection cycle, from infecting a cell to producing new infectious particles:
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Method validation is the documented process of confirming that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. It evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limits, and robustness. Validation criteria depend on the regulatory context and the sample type.
System suitability tests are short checks performed before or during an HPLC run to verify instrument and method performance. They often include resolution, tailing factor, theoretical plates, and injection precision. Results must meet predefined limits for sample data to be accepted.
HPLC retention time alone cannot definitively identify an unknown substance. A match with a reference standard under identical conditions provides supporting evidence. Confirmation typically requires mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, or another orthogonal technique.
Validation establishes suitability for a new method, while verification confirms that a method works in a specific laboratory. Verification is often used when a validated method is adopted with existing equipment and staff. Both rely on documented acceptance criteria.